Dave Gallaher: Out of History into the legend

It is hard to make a post on Dave Gallaher. In a time when the news (such as the death of sir Edmund Hillary) last a few hours, maybe even a few days, in everyone's memory, who's spending 5 minutes time to think about Dave Gallaher's contribution to rugby?

You may have not noticed but there are thousands of references in the world of rugby to this man's contribution that we don't even pay attention to:

  • Have yo seen this picture? If you are an All Black supporter or if you have ever wanted to get a piece of information on the rugby of the Long White Cloud Land, you may have visited http://www.allblacks.com/ and seen this picture. Among the great legends of the All Blacks, the first on the left, you will find a nineteenth century-born gentleman. He is Dave Gallaher.

  • Take a look closely now the next one. See any sign of Dave Gallaher in it? No? Really? Well, perhaps you might have noticed at the right side of the picture a blue player over the white line with a number 2 on his back. Well, he's the hooker, isn't him? Nothing wrong about it? Perhaps you should know that it was first Dave Gallaher the one who first assigned the task of throwing the ball in the line-out to the hooker (playing himself at hooker in a number of times) and that has remained unchaged for almost one hundred years.
  • Do you know the origin of the name "All Blacks? Do you think it refers to the colour of the shirt wearing a silver fern on it? Well, you are quite right, but not fully right. You might know that the name was first used during 1905 tour of the Home Nations. A New Zealand side (captained by Dave Gallaher, of course) went on to play 35 matches including tests against England, Ireland, Scotland, Wales and France. They won 34 and lost only to Wales. The team caused an immense expectation from the start. On the newspapers, even the "decadence of the white race" was used as a way to explain the incredible sweeps these men from New Zealand delivered to all the teams in front of them. They went soon to be known as the "All Blacks" but prior to this name, the impressive fashion in which these men played - anyone carrying the ball and being able to play as a back - won them the name of "All Backs". It was Dave Gallaher the first who devised this way of playing for which still nowadays is New Zealand rugby admired even in the bitterest losses.
In 1906, when the incredibly successful team came back home, they were welcome as heroes. Rugby in New Zealand was soon stablished as a national sport and Dave Gallaher's tactics, captaincy and ability had played a key role in it.

On the field, Dave Gallaher played either hooker or wing forward. He was quite tall for a hooker (1,83m was really tall for 1905) and specialiced at wing forward, with a play that raised a lot of controversy during the Originals tour, as the europeans couldn't believe that his play was absolutely legal.

With his natural tactical ability and motivation skills he was clearly candidate to be an outstanding coach and that he did, first for Auckland, and at last for the All Blacks until he volunteered for the World War.


When he was shot in 1917, Dave Gallaher moved out of the History into the Legend.

South African view on new coach's selection

I have taken this pearl from blogs.SARugby.com. Enjoy.

Oval World

Many thanks to Britaniko and the Fenix club de rugby de Zaragoza. My best wishes for them.

All Blacks Around the World (II): France

France is the most visited country in the World. That places Paris in a privileged place amongst the most touristical places of the Earth. (They have a say in Paris: "It is not that Paris might be in France; it is that France actually is in Paris"). Whenever you go, you are likely to find all kinds of people from all over the world but, should you have only one chance to go to Paris, you should definately go there around May or June.

What, worried about missing an All Blacks sweep of the Wallabies at the start of the Tri Nations? Fortunately for you, there is an easy way to follow the All Blacks (and in fact any rugby game) while in Paris if you go to Casey's Bar. Casey's Bar is an Irish Pub, and that means basically massive consumption of Guiness, madness for football and delight at any rugby competition. You ought to take into account, however, that aussies travel as well, and though not so keen to follow their rugby national team (can't blame them), you could find there some Wallabies supporters as well as Springboks supporters... but actually that makes it all more exciting, does not it?

New Zealand Super 14 franchises for 2008 campaign

32 days left and the ball will be in play again with an interesting Blues vs Chiefs at Eden Park.
A great number of players have headed northwards, and quite the same lot of new players are joining the Super 14 for the first time with a lot of new hopes on them. It seems that, as usual, after a World Cup year, it's time for a renovation. Besides, Auckland's Air New Zealand Cup perfect season (they went to win the Cup undefeated) makes us expect anything from the Blues this season.

Here we can take a look to the 2008's squads: I have noted in white the ones that have been capped for New Zealand and in red the new faces of the franchise.

Auckland Blues:
1st row: John Afoa, Tony Woodcock, Nick White, Keven Mealamu, Bronson Murray, Tom McCartney, Chris Heard
2nd row: Troy Flavell, Anthony Boric, Bryn Evans, Kurtis Haiu, Chris Smith
3rd row: Daniel Braid, Justin Collins, Jerome Kaino, Onosai'i Tololima-Auva'a, Nick Williams, Chris Lowrey
Half backs: Danny Lee, Taniela Moa, Chris Smylie
Mid-field: Nick Evans, Isa Nacewa, Ben Atiga, Isaia Toeava, Jamie Helleur, Anthony Tuitavake, Benson Stanley, Lachie Munro,
Outside backs:Joe Rocokoco, David Smith, George Pisi, Jarek Goebel, Rudi Wulf

Waikato Chiefs:
1st row:
Ben Castle, Simms Davison, Ben May, Craig West, Aled de Malmanche, Tom Willis
2nd row: Jono Gibbes, Toby Lynn, Kevin O'Neill, Kristian Ormsby
3rd row: Tom Harding, Hayden Hopgood, Sione Lauaki, Tanerau Latimer, Faifili Levave, Liam Messam
Half backs: Brendon Leonard, Jamie Nutbrown
Mid-field: Stephen Donald, Tasesa Lavea, Callum Bruce, Richard Kahui,
Outside backs: Sosene Anesi, Lelia Masaga, Mils Muliaina, Sitiveni Sivivatu, Dwayne Sweeney, Viliame Waqaseduadua

Canterbury Crusaders:
1st row: Wyatt Crockett, Ben Franks, Campbell Johnstone, Ti'i Paulo, Greg Somerville
2nd row: Corey Flynn, Ross Filipo, Brad Thorn, Ali Williams
3rd row: Richie McCaw, Nasi Manu, Michael Paterson, Kieran Read, Reuben Thorne, Mose Tuiali’i, George Whitelock
Half backs: Andrew Ellis, Kahn Fotuali’i
Mid-field:Tim Bateman, Stephen Brett, Daniel Carter, Hamish Gard, Casey Laulala, Caleb Ralph
Outside backs: Scott Hamilton, Leon MacDonald, Sean Maitland, Kade Poki

Otago Highlanders:
1st row: Jason Macdonald, David Hall, Jamie Mackintosh, Clint Newland, Keith Cameron, Chris King
2nd row: Tom Donnelly, Hoani MacDonald, Hayden Triggs, Isaac Ross
3rd row: Craig Newby, Alando Soakai, Steven Setephano, Adam Thomson, Tim Boys, Ezra Taylor
Half back: Jimmy Cowan, Toby Morland
Mid-field: Daniel Bowden, Michael Delany, Aaron Bancroft, Niva Tau’oso, Johnny Leota, Brett Mather
Outside backs: Fetu'u Vainikolo, Lucky Mulipola, Paul Williams, James Wilson

Hurricanes:
1st row: Andrew Hore, Hikawera Elliot, Jacob Ellison, John Schwalger, Neemia Tialata, Tim Fairbrother
2nd row: Bernie Upton, Craig Clarke, Jason Eaton, Jeremy Thrush
3rd row: Chris Masoe, Jerry Collins, Michael Johnson, Rodney So'oialo, Scott Waldrom,Thomas Waldrom,
Half backs: Alby Mathewson, Piri Weepu
Mid-field: Conrad Smith, Jimmy Gopperth, Ma'a Nonu, Tamati Ellison, Tane Tu'ipulotu, Willie Ripia
Outside backs: Cory Jane, Hosea Gear, Shannon Paku, Zac Guildford

The haka

Google statistics, Feedburner, Google Sitemaps have recently revealed that most of the visits to this blog are about a single keyword: "Ka Mate".

That has kept me thinking whether I should change a little bit the subject of the blog and focus a little bit more on the mere haka or on the contrary, keep posting about what I like most: Rugby, New Zealand and the All Blacks.

I think that rugby has more to offer to a blog than the haka, but from these lines I will be happy to pay increasingly more attention to the numerous readers wanting information for the Haka, be it Ka Mate or Kapa O Pango.

I will start with what I consider to be the best info gathered on the haka: http://www.haka.co.nz/.

South Africa may get an edge.

IRB has confirmed that South Africa will be playing within the full-version of the ELV this year on.

To a lesser extent, the ELV are to be introduced this season in the Super 14 starting on Feb 15th, so it is expected a tough work for all to adapt: players, coaches, referees... and spectators as well!

However, as the IRB has stated, the trial period for the ELV will be over in 2009. South Africa gains thus, an edge over the nations who will adopt it later (New Zealand, you ought to wake up).

Intrepidity is the word that comes to my mind when I review the changes that South Africa is introducing after World Cup success. How different is this country behaving than it did!

Goodbye

Today sir Edmund Hillary died.
Goodbye to him.

Lesley Vainikolo: Playing what for whom?

- Hey, pal, heard the new about Vainikolo?
- The tongan league wing who had previously played rugby for Auckland?
- Well, he might kind of been born in Tonga, but he played for the All Golds.
- How come?
- His family lives in New Zealand, he's bound to New Zealand.
- Ah, I see, so what's the new thing about the New Zealand league wing?
- Well, he's not a league player anymore, he's playing for Gloucester Rugby.
- Oh, hah, I see. So he finally changed back to rugby? It's going to be hard work for the Rokocokoes, Sivivatus and Nacewas...
- No, pal, he's been sidelined for the 6 Nations for England.
- So, let's resume... this guy was playing what for whom?
Just let me ask you a question: Which is sillier? a split between league and rugby or the fact that a player can play for different national teams at different sports?

Peter de Villiers: Is he the right choice?

So, finally it has happened. White's successor is a black in a land where rugby used to be whites game. All in all quite tricky, but I cannot imagine a better moment for the SARU to make a pick in the direction that everyone is wishing South Africa's rugby to take: Make rugby reach to black population!!!

Have not South Africa become World Champions? Didn't they all expect this triumph be used in a different manner the one in 1995 was? Then, maybe De Villiers (DV for South Africans) is the right man.

But I don't think it is going to be easy. A bold move has that one been labelled in South Africa; if it were only about seeing who's hot and who can add further value (it never is), De Villiers' task would be far easier. On the contrary, being South Africa's national team Head coach requires him to gather respect from the press, the crowd, the staff... and the players. He starts with that bonus as he is vastly respected but... for how long?

New Zealand host South Africa on July the 5th at Wellington and a week later at Dunedin. Let's wait until then to see how's DV performing.

This week is not about rugby

Auckland is this week full of activity, but nothing to do with the Blues training. In fact, Super 14 pre-season is providing close-to-nothing news and I am waiting for February to bring some excitement (January means mid-winter for us northerns and full-time job).

Meanwhile, Auckland hosts an important tennis tournament over hard court which we spanish people usually love.

Who will win this year? Do you know who will I be supporting?


Choose your haka

KA MATE:
  • First performed by the Originals in 1905.
  • Origin of the tradition.
  • Composed by a Maori chief.
  • Known worldwide (better known that the very rules of rugby).
  • 100 years of rugby.
KAPA O PANGO:
  • First performed by Tana Umaga and co in 2005.
  • Breakthru' in All Blacks history.
  • Composed by the All Blacks for the All Blacks.
  • Throat-slitting contoversy.
  • More aggresive, more sport-oriented.

Which one do you like best?

Danny Cipriani at the 6 Nations?

I am not going to say nothing new about Danny Cipriani. Recently, a glimpse to what the 2008 would bring on Planet-Rugby predicted him to be the most notorious thing to happen in Engand's rugby during this year.

Just three days earlier I watched the London Wasps vs Bath game, featuring him as the real star of the match. Just 30 seconds would have passed before the umpire conceded a penalty to the Wasps on their own field. Danny would take the ball and kick to goal and before I could sit down the score was 3-0. London Wasps never looked back.

From that moment on, he would be scoring from every part of the field, penalties and conversions until the very last moment that he would miss a conversion. Not bad.


He's got what is today needed for a first five eighths: phisically talented, fast and superb kicking skills. And he is just 20.

Why now? Will he be included in the 32 named by England's coach this week to represent England in the 6 nations? Will Jonny Wilkinson be the monster that took his side to triumph last Sunday just by kicking penalties and drop goals or will he start any game on the bench?

(Oh! how much we do miss Super 14 games!!!!!!)

My five cents on Sebastien Chabal

He's been the man of the RWC. Despite France didn't perform as expected, the image of the World Cup has been that of Chabal facins the haka in the quarter-final game against the All Blacks.


A hero in his homeland, his name is worldwide known. I can give you an idea on how popular is Sebastien Chabal:

  1. His videos rank on the tops spots of the most watched ones.
  2. He's got a nickname in NZ (caveman) !! (as if it were easy for anyone who's not played for the All Blacks to get a nick.
  3. He's known in Spain (you can't possibly imagine how much this fact means, given the fact that rugby has never, nor will ever be, anything but a most marginal sport).

But the question I want to address is: Is Sebastien Chabal that good? Is he a world class player or is he a fake? Is he just popular due to his looks?

Clearly, to be the starting number 8 for Sale Sharks one must have something. Here you can have a glimpse:

Sebastien Chabal takes on Masoe

And here you can watch the action that broke Ali Williams jaw:

Caveman on Ali Williams



This is it. It's pure strength. As a third-rower, Chabal is extremely strong. You can take Jerry Collins, Chris Masoe, Sione Lauaki or Lawrence Dallaglio. He'll be among the strongest ones. This gives him an edge at the breakdown or when tackling, but from a rugby point of view, that's all. If you want quickness and hability Rodney So'oialo is far quickest, Richie McCaw is much more technically gifted.

But France lacks a real leader nowadays, a leader like Serge Blanco at the end of the nineties. England has got Wilkinson, South Africa has Matfield or Habana, Australia has had a few of them, etc... but what has France got? How did Les Bleus enter to the World Cup? We can recall Le Monde's interview to a France staff member: "Au niveaux des All Blacks sur le plan physique". France's weapons were laid on physicallity and that left Chabal as their true star.

New Zealand and Brazil: 10 similarities and 10 differences

People are concerned over the future of club rugby in New Zealand after a season that has seen so many All Blacks depart to the U.K. and France. Some have even dared to ask for the rule of not selecting players abroad for the All Black squad to be overlooked. In the scope, the future of New Zealand's rugby.

How is it going to be in the future? Can New Zealand afford a strong club rugby like France and England do? Should New Zealand be another Brazil?

This has been differently approached by two players abroad: Rico Gear and Chris Jack a few weeks ago. The lock asked to prevent what he called a Brazil-like situation.

Is this it? Is New Zealand going to become a new Brazil? From this blog we give 10 similarities and 10 differences between these two giants.

Similarities:
  1. They have each arguably the best national team in history at their respective national sports.
  2. They focus on introducing the game to the kids.
  3. Their clubs cannot match foreign salaries.
  4. They were each far less successful at the first World Cup editions than everyone expected.
  5. Their hardest foe is their closest neighbour.
  6. Each of the two have a characteristic "jogo bonito" way of playing.
  7. They have only been world champions when they have had the best defense.
  8. The game has been adopted by the native population and has mixed with the country cultural inheritance.
  9. Both nations stop when the national team is playing
  10. National's team head coach is both the most desired position and hated person in the country.

Differences:

  1. Brazil has nearly got 200 million people and 60 million football players. That makes Brazil on of the most populated countries and the one with more football players. On the other hand, there are "only" 4 million New Zealanders and just 140,000 of them are rugby players.
  2. The GDP per capita is less than 7,000 US$ in Brazil while it is almost 30,000 US$ in New Zealand.
  3. Brazilian streets are full of kids dreaming that playing good football will fill their families with wealth, whereas in New Zealand, there are no kids on the streets (nor wealth in rugby).
  4. Brazilian club competition is of no interest while Super 14 is one of the top club competitions worldwide.
  5. Brazilian clubs hope to sell players to Europe to pay debts whereas Super 14 franchises would love to retain them.
  6. Brazil has won 5 World Cups although lost one on home soil. New Zealand has only won once but played on home soil.
  7. Brazil usually plays awfully during qualifying tournaments and wins every four years, while the All Blacks have been labelled "champions between World Cups".
  8. New Zealanders are too oft seen as "arrogant" by others while no one says so about Brazilians and simply see them as "the best".
  9. In Brazil there is simply no other sport, while New Zealanders love (besides rugby) league, cricket, football...
  10. In Brazil, Graham Henry would have been sacked on October the 8th.

Super 14: 44 days left


February, 15th. 06:35 GMT.

The ball will be kicked and a new Super 14 season will start off. Robbie Deans Crusaders will face the Brumbies at Christchurch. A lot to demonstrate on the Kiwi side (Does Robbie Deans coaching of the Crusaders allow the usage of half-kiwi and half-aussie for the Crusaders?) both for their coach and for some golden stars on the field.

South African Sharks call for a little bit of victimism as some of their key players were used in the late-year Springboks tour and/or have left for the Northern Hemisphere.

RugbyHeaven warns us to pay attention to the Hurrricanes and Auckland's impressive win in the Air New Zealand Cup together with star appointment of Nick Evans are a matter of joy for Blues supporters.

What do Matfield's Bulls think of all this?

All Blacks around the World (I): Spain

I start a new post with a new theme: How are the All Blacks seen around the World. I think that it is a pity that people in New Zealand don't realise how much their team is cherished and respected abroad.

So, let this post be a way to know what the All Blacks mean for people outside the Island of the Long White Cloud. We'll start with a country I know well: Spain. In Spain rugby is not among the top 5 sports... nor the top 10 sports... nor the... ok, rugby is a completely unknown sport, an amateur sport in a time when even Canadian Canoe C1 specialists (not that it is the most popular sport in Spain, either) get enough money to live.

However, the All Blacks can be proud of having a name in Spain, and more people is likely to recognise the haka than to tell the name of any single one rugby player past or present. We can, by the way, even find a bar with a section fully dedicated to the All Blacks in Madrid.

Yes, here you will find it:

Steinlager Madrid

Provided you are patient enough to deciphrate articles in spanish you will get a piece of information about the bar and its relation with the All Blacks, history of the All Blacks, a guide to do the haka and a vast description of the activities that the bar offers.


(Can you think of a farther from New Zealand place dedicated to the All Blacks?)

International coaching moves

2007 is almost over and new coaches have been appointed for the next period. These are the coaches for the 6 Nations and Tri Nations unions and Argentina:

New Zealand: Graham Henry, 2 years contract, reappointed.

Australia: Robbie Deans, 4 years contract, new appointment.


South Africa: Unknown

England: Brian Ashton, indefinite, reappointed

Ireland: Eddie O'Sullivan, 4 years contract, reappointed (before RWC)

Scotland: Frank Hadden, 2 years contract, reappointed

France: Marc Lievrèmont, 4 years contract, new appointment

Wales: Warren Gatland, 2 years contract, new appointment

Argentina: Unknown

Hayman on the wrong side of the haka?

NZRU has confirmed that matches against european clubs during tours in Europe will be played again. Two names have been given: Stade Français and Munster but the actual dates are yet unknown.

The coaching stuff has asked to do so as they claim they have little chance to try emerging players, as nowadays every game they play is a test.

It seems that 2008 calendar gets really stuffy, and should the Super 14 final see a NZ team on it, the players would have only a week before the international season starts. An international season consisting of no less than 14 tests (15 if the game against Argentina is confirmed).

But what intrigues us must is that with the massive exile of All Blacks to Europe (McAlister, Mauger, Hayman, Kelleher, Jack...) is: Shall we see a match confronting any of them against the All Blacks? Shall we watch them facing the haka?

Could you imagine Carl Hayman on the wrong side of the haka as someone else is leading "Ka Mate"?

Obsession, the downfall, Deans says.

The Wallaby coach has done a little bit of talking to the media for the first time after his arrival to Australia and he has said two things that seem of real interest:
  1. New Zealand is full of talent, and the key is "what you do with it".
  2. Obsession with World Cup has been All Blacks' downfall.

It is his purpose to go step by step, week after week, in his new job.

What do you think? Were we all too anxious at winning the Cup and was that our downfall?

Did you know...?

That Henry's best streak as All Blacks coach came from August 13th 2005 down to August 26th 2005 when his team went undefeated for 15 consecutive tests, the second longest streak for the All Blacks in 100 years?

This and many more statistics I have found on nzallblacks.net

Robbie Deans to coach Wallabies

"I am ready for the next stage" Robbie Deans said early this week.
And this next stage has just started today 3.00 AM (which is 3 PM or so on the other side of the world)

The ARU appointed for the first time in its history a foreigner for the Wallabies coach job and Deans gets thus the deserved opportunity that the NZRU didn't give to him. It is going to be a busy season for Robbie Deans as he holds the Cursaders coach job, and it is going to be interesting to see him coaching at the Cursaders the players that he will eventually face as rivals some months after (or, seen from the other side of the Tasman, it will be interesting to see him against the teams whose players he is to coach some months after).

Some online media keep their particular "crusade" on who's best, pointing to the Bledisloe will as the judge (As though it would be fair for anyone).

For my part, I can only wish him the best results as Wallaby coach except when he's facing the All Blacks; here or there, in Canberra or in Dunedin, in Durban or in Buenos Aires.

Why did we lose?

December the 12th. Two months ago we received a painful defeat that left most of us empty. It happened at Cardiff, October the 6th. The score was close, 18-20, the tears were intense, the scars so deep.

It still hurts to me but as a new year is drawing near, I think it's time to move on. And I think having my say on what went wrong is a required step in that direction.

Over the past two months I have read this and that and I have not got a clue on what went wrong. I know the numbers: $ 20 million spent, the reconditioning program, the number of games every player had, I can tell you the surprises of that day's line up: Howlett not in, Mils at centre, Robinson at second line, All Blacks coach claiming that the team had to learn from the errors on 2003...

I have gathered a few different points of view on why did we lose:

  • Planet Rugby has an interesting post. It states that New Zealand did not play that day the way it used to do. Too many rucks, much too different of what had taken the All Blacks to beat France the previous 5 times they met.

  • At Yahoo! Answers you will find lots of opinions: Most of french fans blame it to over-confidence. Some say the All Blacks proved not to being able to win a close game, some say the player selection was not good and some say simply France was better that day.

  • If you can separate fair opinions from gossip, maybe you could try to get some decent opinions at NZ Herald.
  • Graham Henry blaming on to referee Wayn Barnes can be found at Scoop

But none of this has really convinced me. What is missing? What needs to be filled?

It is hard to tell. Players tried their best, the coach tried his best, but so did the french, and I think there were some key points that should be merged to have a decent answer to the question WHY?

  1. France had been studying New Zealand for the last two years, trying different game displays in every previous loss to see how to tame the All Blacks. They used this experience to their benefit.
  2. The gameplan that France proposed was queer enough for All Blacks not to be familiar with. True that french players were not familiar with it either, but the fight of the french was against the All Blacks, not against the gameplan. The top favourites were drawn to something they did not expect.
  3. The french defense was superb. Much has been said of the number of rucks that the All Blacks provoked. But of course they would have preferred line breaks as they usually did during the previous tests against France! The high number of rucks created show the hability of french players to successfully defend. Don't forget that Laporte claimed that discipline had been the key.
  4. Fear. Once again, New Zealand team seem to have put their sights a bit further and they did not expect this game to be particularly difficult. When things went really ill and France scored their 20th point, fear was on All Blacks faces. I recall the previously uttered words by Jonah Lomu: "Silently everybody knows what they have to do, they live by the fear of losing." I am afraid that fear was too present for players and that did not allow them to manage a close contested game as they have previously (without any fear) in a number of times, namely this very season at Durban or at the winner-takes-all match at Auckland.
  5. Strategy. The drop goal should not be once and again overlooked as a resource. And I think it is a weakness that ought not to belong to the All Blacks. It is true we all like seeing tries. It is true that we don't like too much kicking, but when a clear chance is in front of you as it was on October the 6th, is it wise to overlook it? I don't question the brave decision of not taking a drop goal then, I question the decision of not taking any drop goals.
  6. It happens. It is part of the sport. Wayne Barnes could made a wrong call. It happens. Luke McAlister ought not to have missed the kick, it happens.
And to finish this long post I would like to remind you what happened during the first 28 years of Football World Cup. Arch-favourites Brazil were once and again eliminated including the unforgetable Maracanazo in 1950. It was not until 1958 that Pelé took his team to the highest place. We don't remember the suffering of Brazil, though. We remember that they have been champions 5 times and that they are the best team of the world.

Thus, I only ask for patience.

French Top 14: a three-horse race?

6 French teams are playing both the French top 14 domestic competition and the european Heineken Cup: Stade Français, Biarritz, Bourgoin, Perpignan, Toulouse and Clermont.

Playing 26 regular games plus pay-offs plus (at least) 6 Heineken Cup games during a season will be hard for them all and makes of the French rugby season a long-distance race.

Provided this six teams were the best last year one would expect the final winner of the Top 14 shall arise from one of these, but the truth is that the favourites are mostly reduced to three: Stade Français, Biarritz and Toulouse. Can the results say something else? Let's see it.

After 4 games have been played at the Top 14 and 3 at the Heineken Cup, these teams look like this:

Stade Français: Current champions of the Top 14 and reached QF lasts year at the Heineken's Cup. They have a powerful line-up, specially at first five eighth. Their start of the season has been quite good and Stade Français is currently second at the Top 14 and leader of its pool at the Heineken Cup but away loses to Toulouse and Bristol (this one being a painful 17 vs 0 defeat) show a weakness that must be overcome if they are to be title contenders.

Toulouse: Byron Kelleher's side is the only undefeated team at the Top 14 after 4 rounds. In an impressive display of power, they defeated current champions Stade Français in convincing fashion and their only loss in this start of season was against Aron Mauger's Tigers. With players like Pelous, Elissalde or centre Kunavore they have the depth and the experience.

Biarritz: With a powerful scrum, they have had slow start at the Top 14 but are performing a good pool phase at the Heineken Cup, where they have defeated the Saracens and their only loss was last week to Glasgow. Their powerful line-up give them excellent chances in such a long competition.

Our opinion: Toulouse have an edge at this point of the competition that they will use to build into confidence and eventually become winners of the Top 14.

New Zealand Sevens: 2 out of 2

New Zealand Sevens did it again; after winning the starting meeting of the Season in Dubai, they won again with a perfect record of 6-0 in South Africa.

Is it going to be a Federer-like record? Last time New Zealand lost a match was back in April when they lost in Australia 24-17 to Fiji. They have a perfect 24-0 record (on grass, of course) since. Federer's current strike (on grass) is 48 consecutive games won.


GRAHAM HENRY


I don't live in New Zealand (I could not live anywhere farther)


I am a huge All Blacks supporter as I discovered rugby when I saw their clear 29-9 defeat of France in 1987. I have followed them ever since.


It is hard to get "in touch" with what is going on there 20.000 Km away from Spain.


But I kind of feel happy for Graham Henry. I think the NZRU has been wise to reappoint him. World Cup isn't everything in rugby or it shouldn't be and he's a great coach and he has proved it.


I think that Robbie Deans deserved equally the chance to get the job (as many others) and it would be sad if he left the Crusaders.


But at some point you have to stop this four-year cycle of hiring a coach, believe you are invincible and come down to earth four years later thinking it was all the coach's fault. I don't know who will coach the All Blacks in 2011 (it could be Deans, you know) but at the moment, NZRU has sent a message of wisdom and we public ought to hear to it.


Everybody's talking about it

- What's ELV? The new rules.
- Which new rules? Those saying there won't be penalties anymore
- Ey! No penalties? What then? Well, there will be some, but it will all mostly be free kicks.
- Superb! Then Andrew Mehrtens will be the top scorer for the All Blacks for a long time! Hahahahah. It seems so, yes.
- Are there any other new rules? Well, backs shall stay at least five meters behind the scrum, passing the ball back from outside the 22 to inside the 22 won't permit a kick to touch.
- Won't it? Why not? What if you kick to touch? The lineout will be in line where the kick was taken.
- Pheew. Any more? Well some other changes like the ball in the lineout can be thrown backwards
- What is the aim of these changes? To allow more playtime and to increase the number of tries.
- Aha, I see. Will these laws apply to every rugby match? This year they will only be used during Super 14.
- Will the Crusaders win again? That I cannot say.

Grant Fox, amongst the bests ever

Whoever makes a list of the best ever players at first five eighths will consider Grant Fox as a contender to such title. Some argue he changed the game as Grant Fox was the first true goal-kicker, an important role in the late 80's when New Zealand obtained the first World Cup ever played.
He also introduced the today well-known technique of leaning the ball forward prior to the kick that everybody uses now from Jonny Wilkinson to Daniel Carter. In New Zealand he played for Auckland in a time when the word "professionalism"meant playing with 13 instead of 15 and so no Rebel Sport existed yet.

As an All Black he kept winning every test and match from 1985 until1988 (including five test matches in 1987 World Cup) when his All Black side drew against the trans-tasmanian neighbours. His first defeat as an AllBlack came as late as 1990 to a Wallaby team that was getting better day afterday (and would eventually become World Cup winners a year later). After 1991 World Cup defeat to Australia again, things were coming to and end. Grant Fox had to fight for starting off the bench and so he did and tried hard, playing in an impressive form during the1993 Lions series.

He was inducted into IRB Hall of Fame in 2005.

New Zealand win Dubai Sevens

New Zealand emerged victorious of a hard-fought final against last year IRB Sevens runner-up's Fiji.

Leading 21-0 at half-time, New Zealand had again to fight against a come-back of their rivals during the second half. New Zealand succeeded again to reach clear first spot undefeated, winning thus the Dubai Sevens tournament for the first time since 2002.

Semifinalists of the tournament were South Africa - who lost against the Kiwis 12-7 when a late try of the south africans was ruled out to a forward pass - and England, who lost 22-21 in another dramatic semifinal against Fiji.

«Argentina belongs in the South» IRB says

The dilemma about Argentina's integration in a major Nations' tournament has made a step forward towards its decission. The IRB has divised a plan to integrate Argentina into the Tri Nations around 2010. The plan means an increase in the tests the argentinians will play in 2008 and 2009.
The solution will not be easy. A look to the map sets Argentina closer to the three SANZAR nations than to the northern hemisphere ones. However, argentinian players massively play in France, Italy and the United Kingdom and that makes it easier to find a place in the calendar for the 6 Nations. Thus, most argentinian players have stated their preferences on playing against the european nations. There even were contacts between the UAR and the spanish city of Valencia to make that city the official place for the Pumas' european tests.

The IRB has, however been clear; Argentina's integrations shall be inside of the Tri-Nations. It will raise doubts on how to arrange Top 14 and Premiership calendars when tests matches are to be played.

Now some further questions arise: Will aregntinians still massively go to Europe to play? Will a argentinian franchise be created for the Super 14? That would be a very interesting point, I think.

Dubai Sevens: NZ, South Africa and Fiji advance easily

Frances's second half almost complete come back was the only cause of concern yesterday at Dubai. Luckily for the Kiwis, a late penalty by Emmanuel Etien did not go in.

Samoa, Fiji and South Africa also completed a sweep of their pool matches and the four are clear favourites for the first Sevens tournament of the season.

These, are the pairings for the QF:

Fiji vs Scotland
Samoa vs England
South Africa vs Kenya
New Zealand vs Argentina

Some more

It's so sad when instead of staying together, this is all that some media are capable of.

New Zealand rugby does not deserve this.

The All Blacks don't deserve this.

It's hurting New Zealand's rugby


I find complete nonsense this everlasting gossip about who's in the pole position to become the next All Blacks coach. I think it does not do any good. Today we have an apparently contradiction in different news by RugbyHeaven and New Zealand Herald.

This has even gone so far in the case of RugbyHeaven that it even dares critizising the board composition.


I would like this week to pass, it is Friday 7th and the board will have made its decission on who's the next All Blacks coach. I would also love not hearing anything else from now on about this matter until it's over.


I bet it won't be easy.

The New Zealand Herald on All Blacks coach election

«With Henry and his cohorts having thrown their hats firmly back into the ring, the NZRU board must now decide if it wants to risk losing Deans to Australia in order to persevere with the regime that failed in France.»


The New Zealand Herald, Tuesday 27 November 2007

I have usually considered that newspapers here in Spain spread bullshit. "Selling news" is a business that in this country means feeding lies to people. The most absurd thing in this nonsense is that people are eager to buy these lies. Lies usually look like this: "We who vote for X are right, others are wrong". Ok, it's normal. This is Spain and we are quite stupid... people don't even know about rugby, here :-P

But I thought this was some kind of spanish folklore, and I can't really believe that on the opposite side of the world The New Zealand Herald is so biased in favour of Robbie Deans' as the next All Blacks coach.

There are, I think, two different things that should never be mixed; news and opinions. News are the plain facts; opinion is what we think about it. A newspaper should never mix them.

In this blog, you will find a clear support of Graham Henry in his goal of being re-appointed as All Blacks coach. I think that four more years would be a rare continuity which New Zealand's rugby needs. Besides, I trust Henry. But this is just the opinion of one person - the author of this blog - and it does not by any means replace in any way any newspaper whose main goal should be Information.

Carter's burden and Henry's re-applying


It is a pretty chance what we've got here: On one hand, there's Daniel Carter saying that although he loves the All Blacks it could be better for him to spend some time abroad. On the other hand, Henry's re-applying.


What's the connection between these two issues? Well, let's see: The whole New Zealand blaming at coaches and players. How many times have you heard how big was the amount of money spent in this RWC campaign just to immediately point out that this time we did it worse than ever? Lots of All Blacks leaving and... what is next? The NZRU appointing a brand new All Black coach? Is this some kind of the old "let's start over again, we can't afford failing again!"?

As I see things:
1.- Graham Henry should be considered as our best coach for the way the team has been playing for four years. Sacking him for one game lost against France (it's a game after all) is like stating: "We will not tolerate any loss".
2.- If the problem for New Zealand players is the "burden", it will certainly not be diminish in four years time. Firing Henry will only make it heavier.
3.- You can't buy success (assuming fair play). That's the beauty about sports.

Not linked? You should not fool yourself.
If players are leaving and they say "Hey, it's too much of a burden", is it of any help saying: "We don't care for the Tri-Nations victories, we don't care for the Bledisloe Cup, we don't care the 87,5%, you lost at the World Cup, you are out"?

McAlister at second center in England

In his debut at the English Premiership, Luke McAlister has deeply impressed the Sharks supporters as his side defeated Worcester Warriors 15 - 34. Leading 3 - 15 at halftime, victory was never at risk for the Sharks and it allowed an exquisite offensive display by the player who played second five eight with the All Blacks.

It makes me wonder what do they do in England when they don't have Howletts, Haymans, Maugers or McAlisters around.



I was recently watching to a Manawatu vs Waikato game from last Air New Zealand Cup and I wonder whether it was a different sport. What is it that the northern hemisphere lacks that only can get it from New Zealand? Whatever it is, it seems that money can somehow replace it.

Carter to quit the All Blacks?

Reportedly by New Zealand Herald we read that Dan Carter could be considering moving to England after his present contract with the NZRU ends next year.

What can I say? Dan has been a keystone for the Crusaders and the All Blacks for the last four years. We who support the All Blacks are extremely disappointed with New Zealand's Rugby World Cup campaign and I cannot resist the temptation of wondering whether Carter is also under any kind of post World Cup shock when stating that. After Jack, Mauger, McAllister, Hayman, etc.. left to Europe it may kind of be hard to think of keeping on fighting once again after 2003 and 2007 failures with the same old "next time we will surely make it" prospects. Dan, at 25 has already won everything that can be won both with the Crusaders and the All Blacks (except "you know what") so it seems that he is to choose between moving to England to find new goals or staying in New Zealand where for four years he won't be able to win anything that he has not already won.

On the other hand, we supporters who don't usually get tired at watching our heroes trying once and again, feel somewhat left appart by Carter. Will he do it? Will he leave us when we so badly need him? What will become of guys like Richie McCaw if they are all leaving? Will they also leave New Zealand? What will become of us, now?

I like to think of competition (any kind of competition) as the same old game with the same old clues either to win or lose. And in team sports, relationships between teammates are the key to success. Ask Gregan and Larkham for their opinion in this matter. I think that a succesful All Black team will need Carter badly. Not because he is arguably the best first five eights we can find but because he is an experienced and young guy. How long will it take to replace him in the team? Not as fly half, but as a guy? How long will it take to replace the hole left by Kelleher, Howlett, etc?

If I could have a few words with him I would like to point out that rugby in New Zealand has a special aura that he won't find in England. I guess he would miss it. We would miss him. New Zealand would miss him.