14 Anthony Tuitavake. He deserves a chance with the All Blacks.
13 (left blank)
12 Ma'a Nonu. At last, he's doing his business.
11 Bryan Habana. No words.
10 Nick Evans. I know you won't understand, but I would always put him here.
9 Brendon Leonard. He's my 9.
8 Ryan Kankowski. Everybody knows my liebling player is So'oialo, but here I must concede.
7 Schalk Burger. Just look at the Stormers with and without him.
6 Jerry Collins.
5 Andries Bekker. It's hard to choose between him and Vickerman, so I pick both.
4 Dan Vickerman.
3 John Afoa. No other.
2 Keven Mealamu. The best. He also scores tries.
1 Tony Woodcock. No less than him.
What would be yours?
PS: This is my last post before Super 14 Final. So, for the first time this season I will say: Forth Crusaders!
This is a nice collection of some tries scored this season.
One day after, this has been published by this website in their article about big names not making the All Blacks. Aparently greatest of them all is that of Piri Weepu.
Yeah, you are right; according to scrum.com this is supposed to be no other than Piri Weepu. Yes, I repeat, Piri Weepu.
2 mistakes in 2 days and both were related to southern hemisphere rugby. It must surely be the high quality rugby played northwards... Yeah, it must be so.
But I must say that I would have never expected you to say, just one day after Jerry Collins announced that he was to break his NZRU contract, that he would not have made the All Blacks in any case.
Mr. Henry: I think it does no good to anyone. Not that people could not see that JC was a bit out of form, but still he was our clear first option at blindside. And, if it was not yours, it does no good at all to say it just one day after JC spoke. It is good that people like Kaino or Read have a chance. They do deserve it. But, does JC deserve you saying this? Are you at war on him or anything? It is, in the best of the possible situations, a very nasty thing to say.
I have always supported you, Mr. Henry, but I feel it is fair to say that this was an ugly thing to do.
Does that mean that any fool can be a reporter for scrum.com? How long does it take to go to the Wikipedia (for example) and take a look to find the truth if you are not sure?
People from scrum.com, Doug Howlett did play for the Blues and only for the Blues at the Super 14.
It is going to be a very special game for Robbie Deans, who will try to leave the Crusaders with a last win, at home, in Christchurch.
Crusaders 33 - Hurricanes 22
Waratahs 28 - Sharks 13
It may not be as famous as the Super 14 or the Premiership, but it includes 6 teams that could surely kick the ass of more than just one european club. It is a competition ruled by the Pacific Rugby Union.
- 2 teams from Samoa: Upolu Samoa and Savai Samoa
- 2 teams from Fiji: Fiji Warriors and Fiji Barbarians
- 2 teams from Tonga: Tau'uta Reds and Tautahi Gold
It is a relatively young competition, a single round robin competition with the best two teams facing each other in a final game.
2006 saw the Savai Samoa crown champions while in 2007 Upolu Samoa defeated Tau'uta Reds to win the second edition of the Pacific Rugby Cup.
This year, Upolu Samoa have also reached the final but their rivals will be Tautahi Gold, and the final game is played in Apia within a few hours!
- around 40% believe it is going to be Sharks. Crusaders
- aorund 40% believe otherwise, it is going to be Sharks vs Hurricanes
I mean, what the f....
The you come down to reasonings, like Steve Farrell tries to do and... oh! surprise!!! his prediction is that the Sharks will win by five!!!
Ok, I am no Waratahs supporter, but ademittedly, few teams have shown the consistency that the 'tahs have shown during this season. Not the Sharks, for sure. I feel that I must give some realistic data over the Waratahs chances to go to the semifinal.
- Since 1996, only 4 times out of 24 (17%) a Super Rugby semifinal game has been won by an "away" team.
- From 2003 on, no team has won an "away" Super Rugby semifinal.
- In 2008 the both Waratahs and Sharks have won every single game at home, but only 3 out of 7 games played away.
- Their game in Sydney earlier this year resulted in Sharks second loss of the season by 25-10
- The Sharks have managed to win just three times (out of ten games) against the Waratahs.
I think this semifinal will be very very very close. Both teams are excellent at defending but I think the Waratahs have a better attack. I don't expect a clear winner but in the end, the home soil can be a decissive factor.
Of course, the Sharks have their own chances but what I think is nonsense is this absolute certainty of certain media in the Sharks triumph.
What now? Is Super 14 not enough for the All Blacks? Or could it be that it is a bit difficult to adapt to the new ELVs?.
What are then, northern hemisphere teams going to face if it is needed at least 2 to 3 months to get used and reach the test level that Henry wants? What is going to happen in the test games in november?
Thus, the semifinals will be Crusaders - Hurricanes and Waratahs - Sharks.
The Hurricanes are thus, classified, and the Blues are out of the top 4.
Lions 13 - Stormers 22
Reds 11 - Waratahs 18
Blues 19 - Hurricanes 17
I remember I first predicted Crusaders, Sharks, Hurricanes and Blues.
Two weeks ago I said Crusaders, Waratahs, Hurricanes and Chiefs.
And with one day to go I say: Crusaders, Waratahs, Hurricanes and Stormers.
What will be the end of the road?
Wayne Smith says NZ wants them too.
Does it mean we will have an ELV Tri-Nations?
What does South Africa think?
They are out of the semifinals and no one but them is to be blamed.
Lions 33 - Chiefs 27
Sharks 33 - Cheetahs 14
Both in the game and in this 2008 season the Blues took and early lead just to fall victim of some slumb. They did however end on a high, which was enough to secure them 5 points but... will it be enough to make the semifinals.
Highlanders 15 - Blues 40
Hurricanes 21 - West Force 10
In fact, only the strongest South Africa has been able to stop the All Black machine of rugby, being the Springboks/All Blacks tours the most intense that this game has witnessed.
Please, do forget the Northern Hemisphere.
But it happens everywhere. Ford was the everything in the world of automakers until the decade of the thirties, where so many changes in the industry saw a new giant best prepared to become the world leader (no other than GM, who, 70 years later, was also banquished when it was not strong enough to compete). Take Microsoft, the world leader was innovative but at the end died of success when a new kid on the block, Google, was healthier and ready to face the changes the industry needed.
Now come back to New Zealand. New Zealand have got the strongest rugby culture in the world. Their love for rugby is immense, and their have been the world power while rugby has been an amatheur issue, and also during the first and a half decade of professionalism, when the NZRU has been able to retain kiwi players at home.
The idea was that rugby in New Zealand was a home issue, and the best players of this secret world were shown abroad during tests and no one could match them.
Now players are not playing at home anymore: McAlister, Howlett, Jack, Hayman, Mauger, Rush, Marshall, Gear, Kelleher... are already gone. Evans, Flavell, Nacewa will. Collins, Carter, Tu'uiali most likely.
And NZRU cannot keep them at home any longer. Rugby has changed. Definately and forever. Provincial championships will no longer sustain the game. Privatised franchises will have to arise and the game become a business like business is football or basketball. Who shall rule then? When the Internet appeared, no one was greater than Microsoft and, even so, they fell to Google. Why? Because they were not flexible enough to adapt. With size often comes resilience to change. And the surname of adaptation is change.
Will New Zealand be adaptable enough to face the changes after 100 years of being the best?
The problem arises when you read that his contract is for three years. What will happen at the RWC 2011? By that time, he'll already be 34, and many things will have changed (I'm sure). Perhaps the NZRU will have agreed to let the players abroad play with the All Black jersey by that time.
Perhaps the RWC will not be it all in the rugby world.
Perhaps.